You can get the same beaver population density with a double lodge, so why even build a triple?
The triple lodge consumes 12 cubic spaces for 35 resources to house 9 beavers. The double consumes 8 cubic spaces for 20 resources to house 6 beavers. Since the beaver population density is the same (.75 beavers per cubic space), why even build a triple lodge? Additionally, the cost to build the structures are not balanced either. Referencing the beaver density, the resources to build the structures can also be compared in a similar fashion.
As the game stands, I see no benefit to construct a triple lodge.
Comments: 1
Oldest
•
Newest
•
Most likes
•
Fewest likes
-
01 Oct, '24
ArxonHighlighted comment
Logs are infinite, so there is no point in considering their consumption for a one-time construction of a building. Everything is correct about the space it takes up, the only advantages that the building gives are aesthetics and compactness (1 door for 9 beavers)
This field of trees is enough to support 300 beavers, all the factories and buildings on the map.
lxf9r4roxsrwmqmwkv9l.jpg