Large size pump equivalent for iron teeth - upgraded IT pump
What it says on the tin, possibly a 2 beaver one instead of folk’s 3. IT uses a lot of water as well since it’s integral to their population growth and they have to irrigate more due to less efficient farming.
Comments: 4
-
08 Nov, '23
Grey KyliaI disagree 100% IT don't need to get one of the very few benefits that FT finally has over them.
The large pump helps FT a huge amount because they have a terrible time making reservoirs. You need to make multiple layers of pumps to drain it all out OR multiple small reservoirs that feed into each other and both are annoying. With the larger pumps they can make slightly larger reservoirs or just pump up enough during the wet season to not need reservoirs so much. It relieves, not eliminates, one of the worst things about FT in one fell swoop.
IT has always had a HUGE advantage because they can make super deep reservoirs and thats fine, it was their thing. They basically have no need for the faster and larger pumps because they can afford to take it slower due to more depth. SUPER late game you can even have a 12 depth reservoir and be able to drain it dry fully with just 2 levels of pumps. FT would take 12 layers for the same reservoir and thats ridiculous. FT NEEDED a better pump. -
09 Nov, '23
Gin Fuyou AdminYou don't really need deep reservoirs if you don't play on difficulty above normal, in late game FT can pump deep easily with mechanical pumps, putting aside that natural reservoirs are generally very inefficient in the late game.
So i would call this "HUGE" advantage just a minor pleasant bonus.
FT have far superior farming and super easy power, it's clearly IronT should be balanced not to fall back now. -
12 Feb
Laura MergedI think Ironteeth should have access to a better waterpump considering they use it for multiple things other than just drinking. Breeding pods, Hydroponic garden, Coffee....
-
16 Feb
Gin Fuyou Admin"Ironteeth better water pump" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-02-12), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.